My grandma just clicks on the red fox and does whatever online. A lot of people don't use any software outside of the browser, so it's pretty good-enough I guess.

The business case for ChromeOS (Linux)

4 horseman, you're welcome.

They're around 6,600lbs (3,000kg) so maybe even 3 tons of shitbox!

>series of cron jobs and Playwright scripts

This is approximately the Dropbox reply.

>I can only guess it's really not for "us"

Exactly correct.

> >series of cron jobs and Playwright scripts

> This is approximately the Dropbox reply.

lol that wasn't my intent but I totally see it now.

I actually don't want to be dismissive of OpenClaw; I want to believe the hype. It's just what I've heard and what I see don't add up to me. If anything, it's a calculus where I have to decide if it's worth the time of setting up a machine and the learning curve.

numberOfProgrammersInTheWorld : numberOfPeopleInTheWorld

Interesting, would there be a reason to keep the meat Mark around? Seems like there would be a duty to the shareholders to remove the meat Mark and use that $ for something else.

Because the implication is a random human-generated recipe from wherever has any more risk than the one generated. People who would trust a 'bleach recipe' from AI would also trust it from a Tiktok video or whatever.

Edit: it is irrational to think this way when someone prepares your food¿

But that's just a made up implication to make the other one look better, that's not the only true alternative, so doesn't explain irrationality

The Bling Ring were successful in their crimes for a little while and obviously Mr Security Team didn't stop them. They got caught via the oldest tale in time; a rat on the ship.

This may be true but unfortunately taints any conversation about their rights, which should be equal across all humans, even the terrible ones.

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

"The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race."

Defending doxxing and organized targeted harassment as a mere difference of opinion is a beyond insane take.

Not just defending doxxing: saying doxxers deserve protection from being doxxed.