Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rootnod3's commentslogin

I don't even know where to begin here... Using Haskell, the one language where you really DESIGN by types and use your brain and then using LLMs....

That should be off by default. That alone is a "I won't use this" for me.

I was willing to give it another go. Now I read on this thread that it installs tons of node packages (so much for Rust native code) and even Go packages, and gets many extra processes running along with it.

Modern software. That's why I stick with Emacs or Neovim.

https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/7054

https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/12589

TL;DR: Mix of language tooling, unsigned proprietary blobs, corrupted and/or GLIBC-dependent files, redundant copies of already-installed executables. The Node packages especially are able to run scripts on install. Personal preference aside, might also create issues with security laws, certifications. All without user consent.

Issues opened in January and June 2024. They've been rejected, closed, and opened a couple times since then. No changes directly improving this yet as of April 2026.

Personally, I think even if they eventually fix this, given the attitude shown towards their users' machines, I should probably just use an editor where I don't have to worry about it.


> Our priorities are clear: availability first

That's a delayed April fool's right?


No, just a 6 month old memo that was first opened today, as they said literally the same 6 months ago.

Hardcover not available on .co.jp, shame

And that expert will not have their knowledge from learning through AI

why not?

Yeah, waiting for that too. They should expand the regions instead of new models. Availability is really limited.

I get adding Scheme, but omitting CL seems like a big oversight


Common Lisp Is exactly that. I wish I could use it at work. All my personal stuff nowadays is CL only. There is no other choice.


Now I'm jealous


The cope is hard. Just at this point admit that the LLM tech is doomed and sucks.


But it was clearly really food before the regression, the original link (analysis) says as much.


Just because some people try to use a hammer as a screwdriver it doesn't follow that the hammer sucks.


how is it "doomed"?


The cost far outweighs the profits.


i am already on api tokens for the chinese open source models and no subscriptions. these are all available in the original form open source and priced above the inference cost. i think this is the long term option.

zero degradation in speed or quality seen.


So you see better performance with the API plans than the subscriptions?


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: