I understand there is a point where it's harmful to take time away from them, but there's a point well before necessary where you're still conservative when asking for help but it's a net benefit to take their time.
If it took you 2 hours to not bother someone for 10 minites, that's not necessary but also still net benefit.
Agree there's an optimal here. I'm saying LLM's overall reduce the need to speak to your coworkers and that's a good thing because it opens up more avenues to have interesting conversations. And not "how do you set up this repo".
Anticheat and support for joysticks, steering wheels, VR, etc. is one factor for sure. I would say almost all games people play, which dont fall in the above categories, run out of the box with no or very minor tweaks needed (no terminal).
Some guys choose to do joruneyman work, but they typically have the option if they're not mute or something. It's a choice ij my experience (They like OT or working alone or hate travel)
Consider the turnover rate as an geometric series.
Also 1 foreman in the electrical field runs effectively 50 guys max if good, and smaller sites might be 10 men to a foreman. I currently have 3 foreman running 5 to 6 guys each at my current company (2 close sites of 3)
It's really not the ratio but the turnover. Guys who aren't making it up into leadership self select after 5 years or so.
The ratios seem unbelievable to those in tech, but I'm just saying you're unlikely to make it to 10 years without having at least the opportunity for some leadership.
> make it to 10 years without having at least the opportunity for some leadership.
Maybe if that person is young and hasn't done real work.
The best ICs are often horrible managers, it's a different career. Same applies idea here. Or just don't want to put up with the bullshit, the fights, the showing up drunk to work, or missing tools, etc.
The main issue is an ability to rebuild literally any part of the system from sources. A few changes here and there allow cheaters to bypass anticheat protection in a significant amount of ways
I don't know if I buy the idea that using the vendor parts as examples given in the article align with the analogy.
Architecture is not that; MEP trades aren't architecture. If she used prefabbed wall assemblies or didn't do her own structural for critical parts the analogy would hold (I so not know if she did or did not either way). Plumbing is a completely separate trade the way trading stocks is separate from computing; it just happens to live in the house.
I understand there is a point where it's harmful to take time away from them, but there's a point well before necessary where you're still conservative when asking for help but it's a net benefit to take their time.
If it took you 2 hours to not bother someone for 10 minites, that's not necessary but also still net benefit.
reply