I feel like we need an acronym for this kind of comment. I am pretty sure approximately 100% of HN posts now include at least one comment where someone, somehow, knows that an article is written by AI and resents it.
For Claude we have the ever present "you are absolutely right" and this is like it's human mirror.
Something like TLDR; but meaning "uhg, written by AI".
I'm sure it's me being an idiot, but once again I spent 20m trying to figure how to do a specific thing in google-land and still haven't figured it out. Even if I did set it somewhere, I see things like "Setting a budget does not cap resource or API consumption" with a link to a bunch of documentation I have to analyze.
It mostly does, if you write it well, but it’s less efficient than XML, you have to write it by hand, and there’s no way to “validate” that it’s any good.
This is basically a structured, efficient version of claude.md.
I can't keep up with how fast things are changing. I built this to scan my AI dev sessions chats, search various places I frequent, and recommend tooling, libraries and all kinds of other things I might want to incorporate into my development practices.
reply