Dietrich Bonhoeffer has entered the chat...

Very common fallacy: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!

> While unlikely, we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models .

Wow. That sounds like an admission of guilt.

More info: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260908593295/en/Inc...

Super creepy. Reviewing the trailers and other interviews, I actually get the same vibes as from Sam Altman. Almost exactly same voice. The way they look and try to be handsome and nice while straightly telling lies to your face... Scary stuff.

She also has the SBF "reallllly believe my own BS/drink my own urine" story. I think it's probably true of every con(wo)man out there? You probably can't really con people if you're not genuinely sociopathic.

Read the entire thing and am unsure what the takeaway should be...

The only moat lives at the Pareto frontier. If you are on the Pareto frontier you are good and can charge money. But the frontier is moving every week so it's super competitive. If you are the quickest innovator, I still believe there is a chance for a working business model for them

A fish rots from the head down

Non-paywalled: https://archive.is/nSDJr

I guess the problem is that we humans can believe in contradicting values at the same time.